← sebastiankubiak.tech EN · v 01 · 2026
00 A Deployment Examen

Babel or
Jerusalem?

Eight questions, derived from Magnifica Humanitas, that decide whether the AI system you are about to ship makes the world more like a Tower (concentrated power, hollowed-out humans, opaque accountability) or a rebuilt City: distributed responsibility, dignified work, plural voices, transparent governance.

Take the test
~ 90 seconds · 8 binary choices · self-scored
01 The Binary

Two cities. One choice
on every deployment.

A · The Tower

BABEL

"Let us build ourselves a city, and a tower with its top in the heavens, and let us make a name for ourselves." — Gen 11:4
  • Concentrated power
  • Single language imposed
  • Uniformity over diversity
  • Profit sacrifices the weak
  • Built without reference to limit
  • Self-sufficiency as virtue
  • Result: dispersion, not unity
B · The City Rebuilt

JERUSALEM

"He convened the families, assigned each of them a section of the wall, listened to their concerns…" — Neh 3
  • Distributed responsibility
  • Many voices, common ground
  • Plurality as resource
  • Preferential option for the weak
  • Built within human limit
  • Shared agency as virtue
  • Result: communion, not chaos
02 The Test

Eight questions. One binary each.

Hold a specific AI system in mind: your own product, a vendor proposal, a competitor, a regulation. Answer each question. The verdict at the bottom updates live.

01Dignity
Does this system increase human dignity?
Source · MH §14 · subtitle · standard of discernment
02Agency
Does this system give people more agency?
Source · MH §13, §31 · subsidiarity
03The Weak
Does this system protect the weak?
Source · MH §14, §16 · preferential option for the poor
04Accountability
Does this system make accountability clearer?
Source · MH §89, §102 · "responsibility clearly defined at every stage"
05Work
Does this system improve work, or hollow it out?
Source · MH Chapter 4 · "anthropological regression that undermines social peace"
06Children
Does this system help children think better?
Source · MH Ch. 4 · "if it disappeared tomorrow, would you still know how to think?"
07Truth
Does this system serve truth?
Source · MH Ch. 4 · truth as a common good · ecology of communication
08Power
Does this system concentrate power?
Source · MH §5, §67 · "a more moral AI is not enough if that morality is determined by a few"
Verdict · live score 0 / 8 answered
← BABEL · 0 JERUSALEM · 0
Awaiting your answers.

Answer all eight to receive a verdict. The Babel Test is binary by design. On each dimension, a system either builds the Tower or rebuilds the City. Drift in the middle is unexamined ground, not neutrality.

03 Cases · Q1–Q2 2026

Six real systems. Six live verdicts.

§ Entity Signal Verdict
01 Cloudflare 1,100 humans cut (~20% of staff). CEO confirms AI usage up 6× in 90 days. Q1 revenue record. Profit recycled out of payroll into compute. Babel
02 Microsoft First-ever voluntary buyout in 51-year history. Up to 7% of US workforce (~8,750). Same year: ~$80B AI capex. Big-four total: $725B. Babel
03 OpenAI Model Spec Document governing the behavior of a system used by 700M+ weekly users, drafted by ~200 internal staff. No external mandate, no electorate, no appeal. Babel
04 Anthropic vs Pentagon Refused Pentagon "all lawful purposes" clause. Held red lines on lethal autonomous weapons and domestic surveillance. Trump's response: "fired like dogs." Jerusalem
05 EU AI Act · Impact Assessments Mandatory fundamental-rights impact assessments. Procedural, distributed, transparent. Slower deployments. Many voices, common ground. Jerusalem
06 Anthropic on the Papal Dais Co-founder shares stage at Vatican Synod Hall. Concedes incentives "can sometimes conflict with doing the right thing." Vatican source: "not an endorsement." Mixed
04 Source quotes · Magnifica Humanitas

The Pope's own words.

§ 5 · Power · Private
"The main drivers of development are private, often transnational, parties that are endowed with resources and the capacity to intervene that surpass those of many Governments."
§ 9 · Neutrality · Refuted
"Technology is never neutral, because it takes on the characteristics of those who devise, finance, regulate and use it."
§ 10 · The Babel Syndrome
"The 'Babel syndrome' — the idolatry of profit that sacrifices the weak, a uniformity that neutralizes differences, and the pretense that a single language, even a digital one, can translate everything, including the mystery of the person, into data and performance."
§ 67 · Universal destination of goods
"Ownership of data cannot be left solely in private hands but must be appropriately regulated… patents, algorithms, digital platforms, technological infrastructure and data."
§ Ch. 4 · Work · The calamity
"A society that guarantees employment to only a small fraction of the population, despite having a high level of technical development, risks… a paradox of material progress and anthropological regression that undermines the foundations of a just and stable social peace."
§ Ch. 5 · Disarm AI
"Disarming AI means freeing it from the mentality of 'armed' competition, which today is not limited simply to the military context, but is also an economic and cognitive phenomenon."
05 About this test
Author
Sebastian Kubiak
Domain
Deployment.Engineering
Method
Operationalised social doctrine
License
Open · use, adapt, fork

The Babel Test is a distillation. Eight questions, drawn from the structure of Pope Leo XIV's Magnifica Humanitas, framed so an engineer can run them on a deployment review on Monday morning.

The Babel Test is the governance heuristic the AI discourse has been refusing to write. The people writing AI governance work for the labs they should be scoring.